PEP 230 – Warning Framework
- guido at python.org (Guido van Rossum)
- Standards Track
This PEP proposes a C and Python level API, as well as command line flags, to issue warning messages and control what happens to them. This is mostly based on GvR’s proposal posted to python-dev on 05-Nov-2000, with some ideas (such as using classes to categorize warnings) merged in from Paul Prescod’s counter-proposal posted on the same date. Also, an attempt to implement the proposal caused several small tweaks.
With Python 3000 looming, it is necessary to start issuing warnings about the use of obsolete or deprecated features, in addition to errors. There are also lots of other reasons to be able to issue warnings, both from C and from Python code, both at compile time and at run time.
Warnings aren’t fatal, and thus it’s possible that a program triggers the same warning many times during a single execution. It would be annoying if a program emitted an endless stream of identical warnings. Therefore, a mechanism is needed that suppresses multiple identical warnings.
It is also desirable to have user control over which warnings are printed. While in general it is useful to see all warnings all the time, there may be times where it is impractical to fix the code right away in a production program. In this case, there should be a way to suppress warnings.
It is also useful to be able to suppress specific warnings during program development, e.g. when a warning is generated by a piece of 3rd party code that cannot be fixed right away, or when there is no way to fix the code (possibly a warning message is generated for a perfectly fine piece of code). It would be unwise to offer to suppress all warnings in such cases: the developer would miss warnings about the rest of the code.
On the other hand, there are also situations conceivable where some or all warnings are better treated as errors. For example, it may be a local coding standard that a particular deprecated feature should not be used. In order to enforce this, it is useful to be able to turn the warning about this particular feature into an error, raising an exception (without necessarily turning all warnings into errors).
Therefore, I propose to introduce a flexible “warning filter” which can filter out warnings or change them into exceptions, based on:
- Where in the code they are generated (per package, module, or function)
- The warning category (warning categories are discussed below)
- A specific warning message
The warning filter must be controllable both from the command line and from Python code.
APIs For Issuing Warnings
- To issue a warning from Python:
import warnings warnings.warn(message[, category[, stacklevel]])
The category argument, if given, must be a warning category class (see below); it defaults to warnings.UserWarning. This may raise an exception if the particular warning issued is changed into an error by the warnings filter. The stacklevel can be used by wrapper functions written in Python, like this:
def deprecation(message): warn(message, DeprecationWarning, level=2)
This makes the warning refer to the deprecation()’s caller, rather than to the source of deprecation() itself (since the latter would defeat the purpose of the warning message).
- To issue a warning from C:
int PyErr_Warn(PyObject *category, char *message);
Return 0 normally, 1 if an exception is raised (either because the warning was transformed into an exception, or because of a malfunction in the implementation, such as running out of memory). The category argument must be a warning category class (see below) or
NULL, in which case it defaults to
PyErr_Warn()function returns 1, the caller should do normal exception handling.
The current C implementation of
PyErr_Warn()imports the warnings module (implemented in Python) and calls its
warn()function. This minimizes the amount of C code that needs to be added to implement the warning feature.
[XXX Open Issue: what about issuing warnings during lexing or parsing, which don’t have the exception machinery available?]
There are a number of built-in exceptions that represent warning categories. This categorization is useful to be able to filter out groups of warnings. The following warnings category classes are currently defined:
Warning– this is the base class of all warning category classes and it itself a subclass of Exception
UserWarning– the default category for
DeprecationWarning– base category for warnings about deprecated features
SyntaxWarning– base category for warnings about dubious syntactic features
RuntimeWarning– base category for warnings about dubious runtime features
[XXX: Other warning categories may be proposed during the review period for this PEP.]
These standard warning categories are available from C as
PyExc_UserWarning, etc. From Python, they are
available in the
__builtin__ module, so no import is necessary.
User code can define additional warning categories by subclassing one of the standard warning categories. A warning category must always be a subclass of the Warning class.
The Warnings Filter
The warnings filter control whether warnings are ignored, displayed, or turned into errors (raising an exception).
There are three sides to the warnings filter:
- The data structures used to efficiently determine the
disposition of a particular
- The API to control the filter from Python source code.
- The command line switches to control the filter.
The warnings filter works in several stages. It is optimized for the (expected to be common) case where the same warning is issued from the same place in the code over and over.
First, the warning filter collects the module and line number
where the warning is issued; this information is readily available
Conceptually, the warnings filter maintains an ordered list of filter specifications; any specific warning is matched against each filter specification in the list in turn until a match is found; the match determines the disposition of the match. Each entry is a tuple as follows:
(category, message, module, lineno, action)
- category is a class (a subclass of
warnings.Warning) of which the warning category must be a subclass in order to match
- message is a compiled regular expression that the warning message must match (the match is case-insensitive)
- module is a compiled regular expression that the module name must match
- lineno is an integer that the line number where the warning occurred must match, or 0 to match all line numbers
- action is one of the following strings:
- “error” – turn matching warnings into exceptions
- “ignore” – never print matching warnings
- “always” – always print matching warnings
- “default” – print the first occurrence of matching warnings for each location where the warning is issued
- “module” – print the first occurrence of matching warnings for each module where the warning is issued
- “once” – print only the first occurrence of matching warnings
Warning class is derived from the built-in
class, to turn a warning into an error we simply raise
Warnings Output And Formatting Hooks
When the warnings filter decides to issue a warning (but not when
it decides to raise an exception), it passes the information about
warnings.showwarning(message, category, filename, lineno).
The default implementation of this function writes the warning text
sys.stderr, and shows the source line of the filename. It has
an optional 5th argument which can be used to specify a different
The formatting of warnings is done by a separate function,
warnings.formatwarning(message, category, filename, lineno). This
returns a string (that may contain newlines and ends in a newline)
that can be printed to get the identical effect of the
API For Manipulating Warning Filters
warnings.filterwarnings(message, category, module, lineno, action)
This checks the types of the arguments, compiles the message and module regular expressions, and inserts them as a tuple in front of the warnings filter.
Reset the warnings filter to empty.
Command Line Syntax
There should be command line options to specify the most common filtering actions, which I expect to include at least:
- suppress all warnings
- suppress a particular warning message everywhere
- suppress all warnings in a particular module
- turn all warnings into exceptions
I propose the following command line option syntax:
- ‘action’ is an abbreviation of one of the allowed actions (“error”, “default”, “ignore”, “always”, “once”, or “module”)
- ‘message’ is a message string; matches warnings whose message text is an initial substring of ‘message’ (matching is case-insensitive)
- ‘category’ is an abbreviation of a standard warning category class name or a fully-qualified name for a user-defined warning category class of the form [package.]module.classname
- ‘module’ is a module name (possibly package.module)
- ‘lineno’ is an integral line number
All parts except ‘action’ may be omitted, where an empty value after stripping whitespace is the same as an omitted value.
The C code that parses the Python command line saves the body of all -W options in a list of strings, which is made available to the warnings module as sys.warnoptions. The warnings module parses these when it is first imported. Errors detected during the parsing of sys.warnoptions are not fatal; a message is written to sys.stderr and processing continues with the option.
- Turn all warnings into errors
- Show all warnings
- Ignore all warnings
- Ignore warnings whose message text starts with “hello”
- Turn deprecation warnings into errors
- Ignore all warnings on line 10 of module spam
- Ignore all warnings in module spam except on line 10
- Turn deprecation warnings into errors except in module spam
Some open issues off the top of my head:
- What about issuing warnings during lexing or parsing, which don’t have the exception machinery available?
- The proposed command line syntax is a bit ugly (although the
simple cases aren’t so bad:
-Wignore, etc.). Anybody got a better idea?
- I’m a bit worried that the filter specifications are too complex. Perhaps filtering only on category and module (not on message text and line number) would be enough?
- There’s a bit of confusion between module names and file names. The reporting uses file names, but the filter specification uses module names. Maybe it should allow filenames as well?
- I’m not at all convinced that packages are handled right.
- Do we need more standard warning categories? Fewer?
- In order to minimize the start-up overhead, the warnings module
is imported by the first call to
PyErr_Warn(). It does the command line parsing for
-Woptions upon import. Therefore, it is possible that warning-free programs will not complain about invalid
Paul Prescod, Barry Warsaw and Fred Drake have brought up several additional concerns that I feel aren’t critical. I address them here (the concerns are paraphrased, not exactly their words):
warn()should be a built-in or a statement to make it easily available.
Response: “from warnings import warn” is easy enough.
- Paul: What if I have a speed-critical module that triggers
warnings in an inner loop. It should be possible to disable the
overhead for detecting the warning (not just suppress the
Response: rewrite the inner loop to avoid triggering the warning.
- Paul: What if I want to see the full context of a warning?
-Werrorto turn it into an exception.
- Paul: I prefer “:*:*:” to “:::” for leaving parts of the warning
Response: I don’t.
- Barry: It would be nice if lineno can be a range specification.
Response: Too much complexity already.
- Barry: I’d like to add my own warning action. Maybe if ‘action’
could be a callable as well as a string. Then in my IDE, I
could set that to “mygui.popupWarningsDialog”.
Response: For that purpose you would override
- Fred: why do the Warning category classes have to be in
Response: that’s the simplest implementation, given that the warning categories must be available in C before the first
PyErr_Warn()call, which imports the warnings module. I see no problem with making them available as built-ins.
Here’s a prototype implementation: http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=102715&group_id=5470
Last modified: 2021-02-09 16:54:26 GMT