PEP 263 – Defining Python Source Code Encodings
- mal at lemburg.com (Marc-André Lemburg), martin at v.loewis.de (Martin von Löwis)
- Standards Track
This PEP proposes to introduce a syntax to declare the encoding of a Python source file. The encoding information is then used by the Python parser to interpret the file using the given encoding. Most notably this enhances the interpretation of Unicode literals in the source code and makes it possible to write Unicode literals using e.g. UTF-8 directly in an Unicode aware editor.
In Python 2.1, Unicode literals can only be written using the Latin-1 based encoding “unicode-escape”. This makes the programming environment rather unfriendly to Python users who live and work in non-Latin-1 locales such as many of the Asian countries. Programmers can write their 8-bit strings using the favorite encoding, but are bound to the “unicode-escape” encoding for Unicode literals.
I propose to make the Python source code encoding both visible and changeable on a per-source file basis by using a special comment at the top of the file to declare the encoding.
To make Python aware of this encoding declaration a number of concept changes are necessary with respect to the handling of Python source code data.
Defining the Encoding
Python will default to ASCII as standard encoding if no other encoding hints are given.
To define a source code encoding, a magic comment must be placed into the source files either as first or second line in the file, such as:
# coding=<encoding name>
or (using formats recognized by popular editors):
#!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: <encoding name> -*-
#!/usr/bin/python # vim: set fileencoding=<encoding name> :
More precisely, the first or second line must match the following regular expression:
^[ \t\f]*#.*?coding[:=][ \t]*([-_.a-zA-Z0-9]+)
The first group of this expression is then interpreted as encoding name. If the encoding is unknown to Python, an error is raised during compilation. There must not be any Python statement on the line that contains the encoding declaration. If the first line matches the second line is ignored.
To aid with platforms such as Windows, which add Unicode BOM marks
to the beginning of Unicode files, the UTF-8 signature
\xef\xbb\xbf will be interpreted as ‘utf-8’ encoding as well
(even if no magic encoding comment is given).
If a source file uses both the UTF-8 BOM mark signature and a magic encoding comment, the only allowed encoding for the comment is ‘utf-8’. Any other encoding will cause an error.
These are some examples to clarify the different styles for defining the source code encoding at the top of a Python source file:
- With interpreter binary and using Emacs style file encoding
#!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: latin-1 -*- import os, sys ... #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: iso-8859-15 -*- import os, sys ... #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: ascii -*- import os, sys ...
- Without interpreter line, using plain text:
# This Python file uses the following encoding: utf-8 import os, sys ...
- Text editors might have different ways of defining the file’s
#!/usr/local/bin/python # coding: latin-1 import os, sys ...
- Without encoding comment, Python’s parser will assume ASCII
#!/usr/local/bin/python import os, sys ...
- Encoding comments which don’t work:
- Missing “coding:” prefix:
#!/usr/local/bin/python # latin-1 import os, sys ...
- Encoding comment not on line 1 or 2:
#!/usr/local/bin/python # # -*- coding: latin-1 -*- import os, sys ...
- Unsupported encoding:
#!/usr/local/bin/python # -*- coding: utf-42 -*- import os, sys ...
- Missing “coding:” prefix:
The PEP is based on the following concepts which would have to be implemented to enable usage of such a magic comment:
- The complete Python source file should use a single encoding.
Embedding of differently encoded data is not allowed and will
result in a decoding error during compilation of the Python
Any encoding which allows processing the first two lines in the way indicated above is allowed as source code encoding, this includes ASCII compatible encodings as well as certain multi-byte encodings such as Shift_JIS. It does not include encodings which use two or more bytes for all characters like e.g. UTF-16. The reason for this is to keep the encoding detection algorithm in the tokenizer simple.
- Handling of escape sequences should continue to work as it does now, but with all possible source code encodings, that is standard string literals (both 8-bit and Unicode) are subject to escape sequence expansion while raw string literals only expand a very small subset of escape sequences.
- Python’s tokenizer/compiler combo will need to be updated to
work as follows:
- read the file
- decode it into Unicode assuming a fixed per-file encoding
- convert it into a UTF-8 byte string
- tokenize the UTF-8 content
- compile it, creating Unicode objects from the given Unicode data and creating string objects from the Unicode literal data by first reencoding the UTF-8 data into 8-bit string data using the given file encoding
Note that Python identifiers are restricted to the ASCII subset of the encoding, and thus need no further conversion after step 4.
For backwards-compatibility with existing code which currently uses non-ASCII in string literals without declaring an encoding, the implementation will be introduced in two phases:
- Allow non-ASCII in string literals and comments, by internally
treating a missing encoding declaration as a declaration of
“iso-8859-1”. This will cause arbitrary byte strings to
correctly round-trip between step 2 and step 5 of the
processing, and provide compatibility with Python 2.2 for
Unicode literals that contain non-ASCII bytes.
A warning will be issued if non-ASCII bytes are found in the input, once per improperly encoded input file.
- Remove the warning, and change the default encoding to “ascii”.
compile() API will be enhanced to accept Unicode as
input. 8-bit string input is subject to the standard procedure for
encoding detection as described above.
If a Unicode string with a coding declaration is passed to
SyntaxError will be raised.
SUZUKI Hisao is working on a patch; see  for details. A patch implementing only phase 1 is available at .
Implementation of steps 1 and 2 above were completed in 2.3, except for changing the default encoding to “ascii”.
The default encoding was set to “ascii” in version 2.5.
This PEP intends to provide an upgrade path from the current (more-or-less) undefined source code encoding situation to a more robust and portable definition.
- Phase 1 implementation: https://bugs.python.org/issue526840
- Phase 2 implementation: https://bugs.python.org/issue534304
- 1.10 and above: see CVS history
- 1.8: Added ‘.’ to the coding RE.
- 1.7: Added warnings to phase 1 implementation. Replaced the
Latin-1 default encoding with the interpreter’s default
encoding. Added tweaks to
- 1.4 - 1.6: Minor tweaks
- 1.3: Worked in comments by Martin v. Loewis: UTF-8 BOM mark detection, Emacs style magic comment, two phase approach to the implementation
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Last modified: 2022-04-20 09:53:08 GMT