PEP 753 – Uniform project URLs in core metadata
- Author:
- William Woodruff <william at yossarian.net>, Facundo Tuesca <facundo.tuesca at trailofbits.com>
- Sponsor:
- Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
- PEP-Delegate:
- Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>
- Discussions-To:
- Discourse thread
- Status:
- Draft
- Type:
- Standards Track
- Topic:
- Packaging
- Created:
- 29-Aug-2024
- Post-History:
- 26-Aug-2024, 03-Sep-2024
Abstract
This PEP recommends two discrete changes to handling of core metadata by indices, such as PyPI:
- Deprecation of the
Home-page
andDownload-URL
fields in favor of theirProject-URL
equivalents; - A set of conventions for normalizing and assigning semantics to
Project-URL
labels.
Rationale and Motivation
Python’s standard core metadata has gone through many years of revisions, with various standardized milestone versions.
These revisions of the core metadata have introduced various mechanisms for expressing a package’s relationship to external resources, via URLs:
- Metadata 1.0 introduced
Home-page
, a single-use field containing a URL to the distribution’s home page.Home-page: https://example.com/sampleproject
- Metadata 1.1 introduced
Download-URL
, a complementary single-use field containing a URL suitable for downloading the current distribution.Download-URL: https://example.com/sampleproject/sampleproject-1.2.3.tar.gz
- Metadata 1.2 introduced
Project-URL
, a multiple-use field containing a label-and-URL pair. Each label is free text conveying the URL’s semantics.Project-URL: Homepage, https://example.com/sampleproject Project-URL: Download, https://example.com/sampleproject/sampleproject-1.2.3.tar.gz Project-URL: Documentation, https://example.com/sampleproject/docs
Metadata 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 leave the behavior of these fields as originally specified.
Because Project-URL
allows free text labels and is multiple-use, informal
conventions have arisen for representing the values of
Home-page
and Download-URL
within Project-URL
instead.
These conventions have seen significant adoption, with PEP 621 explicitly
choosing to provide only a project.urls
table rather than a
project.home-page
field. From PEP 621’s rejected ideas:
While the core metadata supports it, having a single field for a project’s URL while also supporting a full table seemed redundant and confusing.
This PEP exists to formalize the informal conventions that have arisen, as well
as explicitly document Home-page
and Download-URL
as deprecated in
favor of equivalent Project-URL
representations.
Specification
This PEP proposes that Home-page
and Download-URL
be considered
deprecated. This deprecation has implications for both package metadata
producers (e.g. build backends and packaging tools) and package indices
(e.g. PyPI).
Metadata producers
This PEP stipulates the following for metadata producers:
- When generating metadata 1.2 or later, producers SHOULD emit only
Project-URL
, and SHOULD NOT emitHome-page
orDownload-URL
fields. - When generating
Project-URL
equivalents forHome-page
andDownload-URL
, producers SHOULD use the label conventions described below.
These stipulations do not change the optionality of URL fields in core metadata.
In other words, producers MAY choose to omit Project-URL
entirely
at their discretion.
This PEP does not propose the outright removal of support for Home-page
or Download-URL
. However, see Future Considerations for
thoughts on how a new (as of yet unspecified) major core metadata version
could complete the deprecation cycle via removal of these deprecated fields.
Package indices
This PEP stipulates the following for package indices:
- When interpreting a distribution’s metadata of version 1.2 or later
(e.g. for rendering on a web page), the index MUST prefer
Project-URL
fields as a source of URLs overHome-page
andDownload-URL
, even if the latter are explicitly provided. - If a distribution’s metadata contains only the
Home-page
andDownload-URL
fields, the index MAY choose to ignore those fields and behave as though no URLs were provided in the metadata. In this case, the index SHOULD present an appropriate warning or notification to the uploading party.- The mechanism for presenting this warning or notification is not specified, since it will vary by index. By way of example, an index may choose to present a warning in the HTTP response to an upload request, or send an email or other notification to the maintainer(s) of the project.
- If a distribution’s metadata contains both sets of fields, the index MAY
choose to reject the distribution outright. However, this is
NOT RECOMMENDED until a future unspecified major metadata version
formally removes support for
Home-page
andDownload-URL
. - Any changes to the interpretation of metadata of version 1.2 or later that result in previously recognized URLs no longer being recognized SHOULD NOT be retroactively applied to previously uploaded packages.
These stipulations do not change the optionality of URL processing by indices. In other words, an index that does not process URLs within uploaded distributions may continue to ignore all URL fields entirely.
Conventions for Project-URL
labels
The deprecations proposed above require a formalization of the currently
informal relationship between Home-page
, Download-URL
, and their
Project-URL
equivalents.
This formalization has two parts:
- A set of rules for normalizing
Project-URL
labels; - A set of “well-known” normalized label values that indices may specialize URL presentation for.
Label normalization
The core metadata specification stipulates that Project-URL
labels are
free text, limited to 32 characters.
This PEP proposes adding the concept of a “normalized” label to the core metadata specification. Label normalization is defined via the following Python function:
import string
def normalize_label(label: str) -> str:
chars_to_remove = string.punctuation + string.whitespace
removal_map = str.maketrans("", "", chars_to_remove)
return label.translate(removal_map).lower()
In plain language: a label is normalized by deleting all ASCII punctuation and whitespace, and then converting the result to lowercase.
The following table shows examples of labels before (raw) and after normalization:
Raw | Normalized |
---|---|
Homepage |
homepage |
Home-page |
homepage |
Home page |
homepage |
Change_Log |
changelog |
What's New? |
whatsnew |
Metadata producers SHOULD emit the normalized form of a user specified label, but MAY choose to emit the un-normalized form so long as it adheres to the existing 32 character constraint.
Package indices SHOULD NOT use the normalized labels belonging to the set of well-known labels directly as UI elements (instead replacing them with appropriately capitalized text labels). Labels not belonging to the well-known set MAY be used directly as UI elements.
Well-known labels
In addition to the normalization rules above, this PEP proposes a
fixed (but extensible) set of “well-known” Project-URL
labels,
as well as aliases and human-readable equivalents.
The following table lists these labels, in normalized form:
Label (Human-readable equivalent) | Description | Aliases |
---|---|---|
homepage (Homepage) |
The project’s home page | (none) |
source (Source Code) |
The project’s hosted source code or repository | repository , sourcecode , github |
download (Download) |
A download URL for the current distribution, equivalent to Download-URL |
(none) |
changelog (Changelog) |
The project’s comprehensive changelog | changes , whatsnew , history |
releasenotes (Release Notes) |
The project’s curated release notes | (none) |
documentation (Documentation) |
The project’s online documentation | docs |
issues (Issue Tracker) |
The project’s bug tracker | bugs , issue , tracker , issuetracker , bugtracker |
funding (Funding) |
Funding Information | sponsor , donate , donation |
Indices MAY choose to use the human-readable equivalents suggested above in their UI elements, if appropriate. Alternatively, indices MAY choose their own appropriate human-readable equivalents for UI elements.
Packagers and metadata producers MAY choose to use these well-known labels or their aliases to communicate specific URL intents to package indices and downstreams.
Packagers and metadata producers SHOULD produce the normalized version
of the well-known labels or their aliases in package metadata. Packaging tools
MUST NOT transform between equivalent aliases, i.e.. SHOULD
normalize GitHub
to github
but MUST NOT transform
github
to source
.
Similarly, indices MAY choose to specialize their rendering or presentation of URLs with these labels, e.g. by presenting an appropriate icon or tooltip for each label.
Indices MAY also specialize the rendering or presentation of additional labels or URLs, including (but not limited to), labels that start with a well-known label, and URLs that refer to a known service provider domain (e.g. for documentation hosting or issue tracking).
This PEP recognizes that the list of well-known labels is unlikely to remain static, and that subsequent additions to it should not require the overhead associated with a formal PEP process or new metadata version. As the primary expected use case for this information is to control the way project URLs are displayed on the Python Package Index, this PEP proposes that the list above become a “living” list within PyPI’s documentation (at time of writing, the documentation for influencing PyPI’s URL display can be found here).
Backwards Compatibility
Limited Impact
This PEP is expected to have little to no impact on existing packaging tooling or package indices:
- Packaging tooling: no changes to the correctness or well-formedness of the core metadata. This PEP proposes deprecations as well as behavioral refinements, but all currently (and historically) produced metadata will continue to be valid per the rules of its respective version.
- Package indices: indices will continue to expect well-formed core metadata, with no behavioral changes. Indices MAY choose to emit warnings or notifications on the presence of now-deprecated fields, per above.
Future Considerations
This PEP does not stipulate or require any future metadata changes.
However, per Metadata producers and Conventions for Project-URL labels, we identify the following potential future goals for a new major release of the core metadata standards:
- Outright removal of support for
Home-page
andDownload-URL
in the next major core metadata version. If removed, package indices and consumers MUST reject metadata containing these fields when said metadata is of the new major version. - Enforcement of label normalization. If enforced, package producers
MUST emit only normalized
Project-URL
labels when generating distribution metadata, and package indices and consumers MUST reject distributions containing non-normalized labels. Note: requiring normalization merely restricts labels to lowercase text, and excludes whitespace and punctuation. It does NOT restrict project URLs solely to the use of “well-known” labels.
These potential changes would be backwards incompatible, hence their inclusion only in this section. Acceptance of this PEP does NOT commit any future metadata revision to actually making these changes.
Security Implications
This PEP does not identify any positive or negative security implications
associated with deprecating Home-page
and Download-URL
or with
label normalization.
How To Teach This
The changes in this PEP should be transparent to the majority of the packaging ecosystem’s userbase; the primary beneficiaries of this PEP’s changes are packaging tooling authors and index maintainers, who will be able to reduce the number of unique URL fields produced and checked.
A small number of package maintainers may observe new warnings or notifications
from their index of choice, should the index choose to ignore Home-page
and Download-URL
as suggested. Similarly, a small number of package
maintainers may observe that their index of choice no longer renders
their URLs, if only present in the deprecated fields. However, no package
maintainers should observe rejected package uploads or other breaking
changes to packaging workflows due to this PEP’s proposed changes.
Anybody who observes warnings or changes to the presentation of URLs on indices can be taught about this PEP’s behavior via official packaging resources, such as the Python Packaging User Guide and PyPI’s user documentation, the latter of which already contains an informal description of PyPI’s URL handling behavior.
If this PEP is accepted, the authors of this PEP will coordinate to update and cross-link the resources mentioned above.
Copyright
This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0753.rst
Last modified: 2024-09-23 14:14:47 GMT